Entries Tagged as 'Shopping'

Un-Freshpair

I’m probably not the most typical shopper in the world… when I decide to buy something it’s generally because there’s a sale and when I shop — I buy enough to last awhile.

Today I was going to take advantage of the FRIENDS13 25% off your entire purchase on Freshpair.com (I was actually thinking about setting up an affiliate account — in the past I’ve made several $200-ish orders and I figure the small kickback and coupons they offer might actually save me money in the future)…

But after adding 21 items to my cart ($216 after the 25% promotion) I read a few reviews and I decided that one of the items I was considering purchasing I just wasn’t going to be happy with, so I went to remove it… simple enough, you either change the quantity to zero or you hit the delete link, right???

Well, no — not on Freshpair.com … it doesn’t seem to work.

So I called customer dis-service… and while they answered the phone quickly and I spoke to a real person without having to go through an automated attendant (normally I’d have praise that as incredible customer service).

I was connected to a man who was to put it politely was snippy — which of course didn’t sit well with me.  While I started the conversation polite, business-like, and courteous (as I would always do when I was calling the first time for customer service), the call quickly went down hill… apparently the “solution” is empty out your cart, clear your cookies, and start over… oh, and if you’re wondering — it’s a known problem (and it’s been a known problem for sometime).

Well, I ask to speak with his supervisor… he told me he was the supervisor, that everyone else had gone home (at 3:50 pm EDT on a Thursday… hmm — my guess is he’s the only customer service person there or he outright lied).

Even more pissed I asked to speak to Matthew the president of the company (I’d seen the very nice thank-you notes included in each of my previous shipments… and I decide to see how far I got).

Well, Matthew was apologetic  but was very quick to tell me that the technical issues of fixing removing items from a cart where people what more than a handful of items just wasn’t a priority for them, that it would require too much effort.

Like I remarked to him… it must be nice to have so many customers you don’t need to worry about customers who want to spend a lot of money with you…

So, I decide I wanted to help them…

I tried to place a separate order for each and every item (free shipping why not punish them by maximizing their shipping cost, after all, they can’t handle large order, so give them the smallest orders possible).  Eleven orders (I cut back on the items) most right at or under $10 each… on a different credit card, and each appears to have been authorized fine (I actually called Chase to check on the three placed on Chase issued cards), but the orders were canceled — no email was sent indicating the order was canceled, and once again when I called their (pathetic) customer service I was told, they couldn’t determine why the orders where canceled, just re-order (lol — like I haven’t heard that before).

Well I guess the only solution is to take my business elsewhere… enough of my time has been wasted on Freshpair.com.

And I encourage everyone else to consider taking their business to a company that actually wants to provide not only competitive prices but good customer service… and that would not be Freshpair.com…

Originally posted 2013-05-02 15:00:52.

STOP • THINK • CLICK

I’ve mentioned the Internet Crime Complain Centerbefore, but the US Government also sponsors OnGuard Online with the slogan

STOP • THINK • CLICK

While most savvy internet users should be aware of most everything on the site, there’s no harm in taking a minute out and visiting it to see if there’s any suggestions that might make your online experience safer.  You may also want to recommend that your bank, credit union, and credit card company link to them.

Originally posted 2009-01-07 12:00:50.

A new way to buy…

I’ve been using Amazon.com to buy most goods for years now; and I’ve used Drugstore.com for awhile, their use of coupons and rewards points encourages you to continue to use them every quarter… their prices are good (not always great), but when you consider their rewards and discounts sometimes the prices are very good.

Yesterday I went ahead and used my last quarter rewards to buy something I’ve never purchased online before, something I thought I would likely never purchase online: toilet paper.

Normally I buy toilet paper when I find it at a very good price, and that’s exactly what I found yesterday.

While it’s not earth shattering to buy toilet paper online, for me it shows a definite shift in shopping — anything is a candidate to order online and have delivered to your doorstep rather than drive to a store to pickup.

I think part of what is compelling about buying online is that the simple process of looking for a good deal is really the end of getting a good deal — you don’t have to jump in the car (hopefully schedule it as part of more errands), go to the store, find what ridiculous place they’ve put the sale items in (if they have them in stock at all), stand in line at the checkout, carry it to your car, drive home, and bring it in the house…

Even in the case that you pay the same it just seems that online shopping makes more sense.

The one thing I’m not thrilled about with online shopping is the carbon footprint of the delivery… that’s something Amazon is partially addressing in larger cities (with their dropboxes).

Originally posted 2013-04-16 12:00:31.

I don’t recommend “The OEM Shop”

On 22-Sep-2010 I placed an order for a “Motorola DROID and DROID II 1300mah Standard Battery” from “The OEM Shop” through Amazon.

I really hate dealing with Amazon Marketplace Merchants since my personal history of such dealings indicated that the likelihood of being disappointed is very high; and this occasions was in perfect keeping with my expectations.

The item was to have shipped by 24-Sep-2010, so when I didn’t see a change in status by close of business that day I sent an inquiry to the vendor.  I received back an automated reply that indicated that they were “on vacation” — and that they’d been on vacation even before my order had been placed (so I immediately considered the “contract” for purchase of an item had been entered into under fraudulent terms — ie, they knew before accepting an order that they would not meet the shipment commitment).

I immediately sent another message via Amazon requesting that the order be canceled.

The following week I got a reply from the merchant indicating that they had shipped the item on Saturday (the day after I’d sent a message to cancel the order — but within the time frame of the first message of their vacation).

I wasn’t sure I believe them; but I told them that I’d been refusing the item and it would be returned to them.

I also contacted Chase to open a charge dispute on my Amazon VISA for the item.

The item never showed up — and two days after I got the replacement item I’d ordered from another Amazon merchant (the order was placed on 27-Sep-2010) I requested that they provide me with the tracking information (which they had never posted to Amazon).

I haven’t heard back from The OEM Shop, I haven’t gotten the item, and I suspect they never shipped it.  I have gotten a permanent credit from Chase for the item so after posting negative feedback and this BLOG article I consider the matter closed.

My advice — don’t do business with “The OEM Shop” — there are too many good alternatives to them, and absolutely no reason to support questionable etailers.  If my experience isn’t enough to convince you — read the other recent feedback posts on 5-Oct-2010 and 4-Oct-2010 on Amazon.

“The OEM Shop” Storefront on Amazon

NOTE: I was notified by Amazon late this evening that a refund would be posted to my account (actually, since the charge-back had already been made permanent there isn’t any change from my perspective).

Originally posted 2010-10-05 14:25:36.

Kingston Counterfeits

Around the end of last November I ordered a Kingston DataTraveler 150 32 GB USB 2.0 Flash Drive (DT150/32GB Orange/Black).  When it came in it seemed to work, and I didn’t really think anything of it, but when I started to try and copy large files to it, or put a significant amount of information on it (which actually wasn’t until around the first of this year) I continually had issues with it.

I contacted Kingston the first week of March to try and get a handle on the problem or an RMA to return it for a replacement.  Kingston then requested that I send them some identifying markings from the metal USB plug — well my unit didn’t have any of those identifying markings, and since those marking would have been covered by the cap I couldn’t have told whether a new product I was interested in purchasing had them or not without opening the package in the store and taking off the cap (and of course mail order there’s no way to do it).

What was really alarming is I had a few other Kingston USB flash drives, and I took a look at them — they also didn’t have any markings on them.  So from that I would have to conclude either Kingston just implemented this and the units I have are from before that time, or all the units I have are counterfeit.  The truly alarming thing is I’m 99.9% positive that all of these units came from Fry’s Electronics, Microcenter, and Amazon.

This indicates to me that there’s a severe problem with the distribution channel of Kingston products, and that the Kingston name brand (and the Kingston warranty) is worthless.  Which means, the purchase of Kingston products should be avoided since they are frequently counterfeited and Kingston appears to be only interested in protecting themselves, not the consumers of their products (since consumers really have no way of knowing if a product is counterfeit).

As Nancy used to say “JUST SAY NO” to Kingston products.

Kingston DataTraveler 150 - 32 GB USB 2.0 Flash Drive

Originally posted 2010-03-15 02:00:19.

LED Lighting

You think those CF (Compact Florescent) bulbs you’ve been buying are green???

Well — think again!

CFs do use considerable less energy than a comparable incandescent bulb, but they (like all florescent bulbs) contain a number of hazardous materials that negatively impact the environment when disposed of improperly (no — you can’t just throw them in the garbage can).

What’s a better choice?

Easy… technology from the 60’s comes to the rescue — LED based bulbs.  They’re made now in a number of configuration and bases to replace virtually any bulb you might have in your house.

OUCH — they’re kinda expensive.

I knew you’d say that… yes they cost substantially more than CFs (especially if you’re in an area where the utility companies are subsidizing CFs); but the thing you need to keep in mind is they consume substantially less energy than a CF and they last much longer.

I would love to tell you that if you factor in the energy savings and the longer life that they’ll work out to be less expensive than a CF; but if you’re buying subsidized CFs that’s not going to be the case.  One question to ask is why are utility companies subsadizing CFs and not LEDs?

LEDs have a much lower impact on the environment; and if enough people start using them we’ll see the prices come down… but doing what’s “right” often has a slightly higher price tag than what’s in “vogue”.

You can purchase LED bulbs at Sam’s Club.  They are selling “Lights of America” (see the link below) and “GE” LED bulbs — it’s rumored that a new Sam’s Club located near Cape Kennedy will use LED lighting throughout the store!

For the best pricing, check your local retailers and wholesale clubs as well as do a search online (consider sales tax and shipping when you compare).

GE Lumination

Lights of America

And maybe we should not only bring pressure on our utilities to subsidize LEDs rather than CFs (or at least in addition to); but get them added to the energy tax credit.

 __________

For background information on LEDs (Light-Emitting Diodes) you can checkout the article on Wikipedia or do a search.

NOTE: LEDs lower power consumption make them the ideal choice for a home solar lighting system.

Originally posted 2009-08-21 01:00:51.

Amazon Prime

I subscribed to Amazon Prime for several years when I moved (back) to Northwest Florida from San Francisco… mainly it was convenient living in the middle of nowhere to be able to click the mouse a few times before late afternoon and have something I wanted (generally) show up the day after the next (2-Day shipping).

However, one of the reasons I dropped my Prime membership was that I was finding that Amazon failed somewhere between 30% and 40% of the time to deliver my goods on the date they promised when I placed the order (often the changed the estimated delivery date on their website after the order was processed as well).

I complained about this a number of times to Amazon, and never really got any satisfaction other than I could get a refund of my Prime membership… what the agents failed to tell me is that for EACH occurrence of a late delivery, Amazon policy was to extend the Prime membership for one month — which they didn’t do with me…

So I’m a little pisses now that I’ve read their policy on that (which they made fairly clear because of the recent snafu with UPS delivering xmas packages).

Based on Amazon’s policy I would have probably kept my prime membership (hell — it’d probably be the next millennium before I’d own them money to renew it anyway)… but of course based on how they treated me as a customer and failed to honor their policy I would NEVER consider paying for Amazon Prime again.

The policies in place to keep customers satisfied are only useful if a company follows them — when they don’t it’s a good bet customers will be much harder to convince to come back.

Originally posted 2013-12-27 15:00:32.

Fry’s Class Action Settlement – Credit Card Return Policy

Seems there’s a Class Action Legal Action against Fry’s Electronics revolving around their credit card return policy.  You can read all the details via the link below, and I’ve copied the text into this blog as well.

Thumbnail… if you did a credit card return to Fry’s between 5 March 2006 and 31 January 2008 you can file for a 20% off (up to a $20 maximum) coupon; you simply need to download the PDF (link below), fill it out, and have it postmarked by 25 July 2008.

Class Action Settlement

Claim Form

———-

California Only

Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action
TO: All persons who, from March 5, 2006 through January 31, 2008, entered into a credit card return transaction with Fry’s Electronics, Inc., in the state of California (“Class Members”).

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THIS CLASS OF PERSONS, YOU SHOULD READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY BECAUSE IT WILL AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS.PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE
This notice informs you about the above-referenced action and a proposed Settlement on behalf of a certain class of persons. This notice advises you of the benefits that may be available to you under the proposed Settlement and your rights and options as a Class Member, and notifies you that hearings will be held to approve the Settlement.

There is currently pending in the California Superior Court for the County of Sacramento an action entitled Krimsky vs. Fry’s Electronics Inc., Case No. 07AS00928 (the “Action”). On April 16, 2008, Judge Shelleyanne W.L. Chang of the Sacramento County Superior Court, tentatively approved a proposed settlement in this Action.

WHAT THE ACTION IS ABOUT
Plaintiff Roger Krimsky filed a class action lawsuit against Fry’s Electronics, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as “Fry’s” or “Defendant”) on behalf of himself and all Class Members. Plaintiff’s law firm (“Class Counsel”), which represents Plaintiff and the Class Members, is Westrup Klick, LLP.

The lawsuit alleges that Fry’s violated California law by utilizing a return invoice for credit card transactions which conta ined preprinted spaces designated for filling in the address, telephone and/or fax numbers of the cardholder. Fry’s denies that it has violated California law, and denies that any class member is entitled to any relief. However, to avoid the expense, inconvenience and interference with its business operations created by the Action, it has concluded that it is in its best interests to settle the Action on the terms summarized in this Notice.

The settlement was reached through lengthy arms-length negotiations between the parties and with the assistance of a neutral mediator, the Honorable Richard Silver (ret).

The Court has determined that the Action should proceed as a Class Action, for purposes of settlement only, with Plaintiff as the representative of the Class, and granted preliminary approval of the settlement, subject to a final fairness hearing discussed below.

THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
THE PARTIES HAVE AGREED TO THE SETTLEMENT GENERALLY DESCRIBED BELOW:

Fry’s has agreed to cease utilizing a return invoice form for credit card transactions which contain preprinted spaces designated for customers’ addresses, telephone and/or fax numbers, except in those instances where required for a special purpose. Such change is subject to modification in relation to modification of the law permitting such.

Class Members who submit a timely Claim Form as described below shall be eligible to receive a 20% off coupon (maximum value of $20 off).

The Parties agreed that, subject to the Court’s final approval, the named Plaintiff, Roger Krimsky, shall be entitled to an incentive award of up to $2,500 in recognition of the risk to Plaintiff as the Class representative in commencing the lawsuit in the Action, both financial and otherwise; the amount of time and effort spent by Plaintiff as the Class representative; and for serving the public interest. The Parties also agreed that subject to the Court’s final approval, Class Counsel shall be entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs of up to $150,000. The Payment of attorneys’ fees will not affect the benefits provided to the Settlement Class.

RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS
If the settlement is granted final approval, Fry’s and each of its past or present officers, directors, shareholders, employee’s, agents, principals, heirs, representatives, accountants, auditors, consultants, attorneys, insurers and reinsurers, and its and their respective successors and predecessors in interest, subsidiaries, affiliates, parents, subsidiaries, and each of their company- sponsored employee benefit plans and all of their respective officers, directors, employees, administrators, fiduciaries, trustees and agents will be released from all claims, liabilities, demands, debts, accounts, obligations, actions, and causes of action, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, at law or in equity, of any kind or nature whatsoever (collectively “Claims”) for Defendant’s alleged violation of Civil Code Section 1747.08(a)(3).

FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING
A final hearing will be held before Judge Shelleyanne W.L. Chang of the Sacramento County Superior Court, on July 18, 2008 at 9:00 a.m., to determine whether the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate and should be finally approved. The hearing will take place at the Sacramento County Superior Court, in Dept. 54, located at 720 9th Street, Sacramento, California 95814. You are not required to attend the hearing in order to participate in the settlement.

WHAT YOU CAN DO
1. To Receive A 20% off Coupon. As a Class Member you are eligible to receive a 20% off coupon (maximum value of up to $20 off). In order to receive your 20% off coupon, you must timely complete and return a valid Claim Form. A Claim Form can be obtained by asking for a Claim Form at a Fry’s return register or by downloading a Claim Form at www.frys.com. In order for the Claim Form to be considered, it must be postmarked by July 25, 2008, and mailed to Krimsky v. Fry’s Electronics Claims Administrator, c/o Desmond, Marcello & Amster, P.O. Box 451999, Los Angeles, California 90045.

2. To Exclude Yourself From The Settlement. As a Class Member, you have the right to exclude yourself from the Action and the settlement. If you are a Class Member and wish to be excluded, you must submit a letter or postcard post-marked no later than June 25, 2008 with the case name, your name, address, and telephone number, stating “I wish to be excluded from the Fry’s Class Action.” To be considered valid, a request for exclusion must set forth all of this information and must be timely received. It must be signed by you personally, in order to be valid. Your request must be sent to: Fry’s Class Action: Krimsky v. Fry’s Electronics Claims Administrator, c/o Desmond, Marcello & Amster, P.O. Box 451999, Los Angeles, California 90045.

If you timely and validly request exclusion from the Class, you will be excluded from the Class; you will not receive any benefits from the settlement; you will not be bound by the judgment entered in the Action and you will not be precluded from otherwise prosecuting any individual claim, if timely, against Fry’s based on the transactions complained of in the Action. If you do not wish to exclude yourself, and have no objection to the settlement, you are eligible to receive the benefits of the settlement if the settlement is approved.

3. To Object To The Settlement. If for some reason you desire to object to the terms of the settlement, you ma y do so under the procedures set forth below. If your objection is rejected you will be bound by the final judgment just as if you had not objected.

If you decide to appear and object, you must file and serve your written request to appear and object with the Court, and upon Counsel for all of the parties by June 25, 2008. You must serve all such notices and papers upon Class counsel and Defendant’s counsel at the following addresses:

Phillip R. Poliner, Esq.
Westrup Klick LLP
444 West Ocean Blvd.,
Suite 1614
Long Beach, CA 90802
(Plaintiff Class Counsel)

William H. Curtis, Esq.
Fry’s Electronics, Inc.
Legal Department
600 East Brokaw
San Jose, CA 95112
(Defendant Class Counsel) 

The mailing address for the Final Approval Hearing is:

Sacramento County Superior Court
Dept.54
720 9th Street
Sacramento, California 95814

Class Members who do not timely make their objections in this manner will be deemed to have waived all objections and shall not be entitled to be heard at the settlement approval hearing.
If you have further questions regarding this lawsuit you may contact Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel, Phillip R. Poliner Esq., of Westrup Klick LLP, at 1-888-268-6884. DO NOT ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SETTLEMENT OR THE LITIGATION TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, TO THE JUDGE, OR TO COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT.

Originally posted 2008-05-14 12:10:54.

Define Your Vehicle’s True Identity

“Define Your Vehicle’s True Identity”, that is the slogan of carID — http://www.carid.com/ –I found this company when looking for a trunk mat for my new vehicle.

I’ve got a great deal of experience with WeatherTech — http://www.weathertech.com/ — I’ve used those in a number of vehicles, but they didn’t make a mat to fit.  So I did some reading and I liked what I read about Lloyd Mats — http://www.lloydmats.com/rubbertite.htm –Rubber Tite series.  They got favorable reviews, and they seemed at a fairly reasonable price point.

Well, like always, I started out pricing by using the internet to see where I might be able to save a little money…

That’s when I stumbled on carID — I’d never heard of them before; and frankly based on my experiences to date I certainly won’t be recommending them.

Here is the note I sent to them on 14-Mar-2011 at 1:36AM CDT

I came in with a 20% off coupon; and the first page says $44.91 for the mats for an 2011 Elantra (Limited – Sedan) — I was looking for cargo and front+back; but when I try and add either to my cart they appear at $67.41 — that’s a pretty hefty difference.

Referrer: http://www.carid.com/2011-hyundai-elantra-floor-mats/lloyd-floor-mats-161257.html

Here is what I got back from them on 17-March at 3:12PM CDT

Hello Soles,
Thank you for you interest in our products, we look forward to serving you.
Unfortunately we don’t provide discounts on weathertech items.

Sincerely,

Anthony Vertser
Customer Service
Tel 800.505.3274 Ext 883
anthony.ve@carid.com

Right… Lloyd and WeatherTech are two separate companies…

So here is what I sent back to them just a little while ago:

I do appreciate you taking the time to reply to my inquiry.. but I don’t think Lloyd (makers of Rubber Tite) and Weather Tech are even slightly related companies. In fact, I don’t think Weather Tech makes a custom mat set for 2011 Elantra Sedan (I’m quite happy with those in my 4Runner – I looked at their offering first).

I’m beginning to get the feeling that your company might not quite meet the bar for ethical advertising and business practices… it just feels questionable at best, with great potential for at least bordering on fraud.

Perhaps I’ll just take my money else where… I get the feeling it would hard to be more disappointed in dealing with an eTailer than I have been with yours.

I’ll be happy to share my experience with others – I wouldn’t want you to be deprived of the exposure.

– LR Soles

Maybe it’s unfair to gauge a company from one interaction — but you know the old saying

Fool me once, shame on you.

Fool me twice, shame on me.

I’ll take my business elsewhere – I don’t mind paying a couple dollars more for an item to avoid what looks like it has great potential to become a nightmare situation quickly — particularly with a statement like:

NOTE: These mats will be custom manufactured to your specifications and once ordered may not be returned for credit or exchange.

On their order page — what if there’s a mistake in their processing, a defect…

I certainly offered them a chance to explain the pricing discrepancy to me; and perhaps there is an explanation — perhaps I made an error… but their response just doesn’t cut it; and doesn’t encourage me to want to spend money there.

If you purchase from them, use a credit card that’s issued through a financial institution you have a good relationship with — sometime tells me you just might need a charge back to get satisfaction.

Originally posted 2011-03-18 02:00:25.

Vibram FiveFingers

I have to say that the first time I saw Vibram FiveFingers shoes I was less than confident that the would be comfortable (or practical).

I talked with people who wore them and decided it would be worth a try as a replacement for my surf booties I used for kayaking.  A pair of “Flow” (the uppers are Neoprene and have a really good gripping sole) is what I settled on.

I tried on a pair, and it took a little to decide on what size was right (I’ll go into a little detail about my thoughts on sizing, etc as well).

…while I had my doubts, I have to say the first time I wore them out in the water I was sold, far more tactile than surf booties, better grip, and surprisingly comfortable right off.

Now I will say that having something between your toes (and putting them on) takes a little getting used to, but it really is just like going barefoot, and it’s a very natural, very comfortable feel.

I decide that I wanted to get another pair to wear to workout at the gym, the Neoprene is great for aquatic sports, but not really the most comfortable thing to wear when you’re working up a sweat.  So I purchased a pair of Classic — and again found them to be incredibly comfortable.

Currently I think I have six different pairs of Vibram FiveFingers — which should give you an idea of who much I like wearing them (in fact, now I find wearing “regular” shoes to be quite unc0mfortable).

OK, so here’s my idea on sizing them; you can start with suggested size from the charts (or guide), but I found it to be too small — and that’s likely to happen to you because a Vibram will be like a second skin over your foot, so there’s way too many variables to take into account, and a simple length measurement just won’t do.  So do not purchase your first pair online, make sure you go in and try them on (find a local merchant).  Also, be aware that different styles of Vibram FiveFingers will fit slightly differently (so you might need one size larger or smaller).

Once you get a good feel for how the size varies by the particulars of the styles, it’s no problem know what size you’re going to wear.

Now for putting them on… and the diagram in the box and the sales person (unless they’re wearing a pair of Vibram FiveFingers) will probably not be helpful.

First, make sure your foot is clean and the Vibrams are clean (I’ll go over washing them too).  Then push the back of the heal down out of the way, slide your foot in with your big toe angled against the side.  when you slip it as far as you can, wiggle your toes (like you’re inching forward) until they slid into the “fingers” — you may need to guide your little toe (it’s been being pushed inward for years by your shoes, so gently help it).  If you find your toes won’t relax into the “fingers”, take your hand and push the bottom of the Vibrams up to match the curl of the toe, then let it relax (don’t try and push your toes down into the “fingers” — that can be painful).

Once you’ve got the Vibrams on, wiggle your toes a little, see if your foot slips back and forth, and make sure you stand up and put your weight on your foot (my foot “grows” with weight on it — so even though some styles seem a little loose when I’m sitting, that’s not the case when I’m standing).

Cleaning, you could throw your Vibrams in the washing machine if you have one without an agitator — but they’d need to be pretty dirty to consider that.  The first time I washed my Flows I just did it in the shower and tossed them in the sink to dry — it worked fine; and pretty much just rinsing out your Vibram Fivefingers every week or so of wear keeps them fresh and clean.

I give Vibram FiveFingers a glowing recommendation for just walking, running, working out, kayaking (or other aquatic sports), or just lounging around the house or errands around town.

You will notice people stop you to ask about them…

 

http://VirbramFiveFingers.com/


Originally posted 2012-05-13 02:00:52.